AUSTIN v. HALLSTROM

No. 477.

86 A.2d 549 (1952)

AUSTIN et ux. v. HALLSTROM.

Supreme Court of Vermont. Essex.

February 5, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest E. Goodrich, St. Johnsbury, for plaintiffs.

Witters, Longmoore & Akley, St. Johnsbury, for defendant.

Before SHERBURNE, C. J., JEFFORDS, CLEARY and ADAMS, JJ., and CHASE, Superior Judge.


CLEARY, Justice.

The plaintiffs' writ states that this is "An Action of Trespass on the Freehold-Quare Clausum Fregit, vi et armis." The defendant's answer is a general denial and justification. During the trial the plaintiffs moved to amend their action by making Helen M. Austin a party plaintiff. The plaintiffs also moved that the defendant be required to elect upon which of his inconsistent defenses he was going to rely. The case is here on the plaintiffs' exceptions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases