1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 40 Wn.2d
  5. 40 Wn.2d 586 (1952)
 

LOPEMAN v. GEE

No. 31968.

40 Wn.2d 586 (1952)

245 P.2d 183

A.L. LOPEMAN et al., Respondents, v. WILLIAM H. GEE, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

June 5, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Holman, Mickelwait, Marion, Prince & Black and J. Paul Coie, for appellant.

Moe & Huse, for respondents.

WEAVER, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment against him based upon his alleged negligence in storing onions belonging to plaintiffs.

[1] At the outset, respondents argue that the findings of the trial court must be accepted as the established facts of the case because none of appellant's assignments points to any error of the trial court, as required by Rule on Appeal 43, 34A Wn. (2d) 47, which provides:

"No alleged error of the superior...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases