1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 21 N.J.
  5. 21 N.J. Super. 598 (1952)
 

ROSELLE v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE

21 N.J. Super. 598 (1952)

91 A.2d 489

PIETRO ROSELLE, CRESCENT J. ROSELLE, ARTHUR ROSELLE AND LOUIS ROSELLE, A PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 9, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel A. Larner argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Messrs. Budd & Larner, attorneys).

Mr. Ward J. Herbert argued the cause for defendant-appellant.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and FRANCIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.C.C.

The Village of South Orange appeals from two aspects of an adverse judgment entered in the Law Division of this court. The contention is that the court erred: (1) in setting aside a resolution of the village board of trustees denying a scavenger license to respondent, and (2) in directing the immediate issuance of such a license to respondent.

A recitation of some history is necessary to a complete...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases