Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh Appeal.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued April 1, 1952.
April 14, 1952.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Carl E. Glock orally argued the case and, with Frank W. Ittel, David McN. Olds, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, Theodore L. Hazlett, Jr., Paul G. Perry, and Burgwin, Churchill, Ruffin & Hazlett, filed a brief for appellant.
John A. Metz, Jr., Gilbert E. Morcroft, T. Robert Brennan, Edwin F. Ellis, Emerson G. Hess, Jr. and James A. Wright, orally argued the case, and, with M.J. Arnd, James A. Danahey, J. Alfred Wilner, James Craig Kuhn, Jr., Louis Rosenfield, Ferdinand T. Weil, Andrew A. Weil, Weil, Vatz & Weil, Joseph F. Weis, John A. Metz, Sr., John E. Winner, Floyd V. Winner, J. Howard Brennan, Leonard M. Boehm, Emerson G. Hess, Sr., Hess & Hess, William L. Jacob, William L. Jacob, Jr., William H. Markus, Robert C. Riethmuller, Harland I. Casteel, J. Wray Connolly, Davis C. Burroughs, Jr., Moorhead & Knox, Drayton Heard, M.H. Hirschfield, Hamilton A. Robinson, Alex C. Grant, Clarence F. Covey, Markel & Markel, J.T. Keller, Harold Obernauer, Harry J. Benjamin, Shoemaker & Eynon, Harry Ravick, Ray C. Hough, Jr., Wilson Barker, Gustav M. Berg, Illario Tornese, Nick Tornese, William A. Blair, and Griggs, Moreland, Blair & Douglas filed briefs for various appellees.
Charles F.C. Arensberg orally argued the case, and with Thomas L. Wentling and Patterson, Crawford, Arensberg & Dunn, filed a brief for Public Parking Authority of Pittsburgh, amicus curiae.
Before DREW, C.J., STEARNE, JONES, BELL, CHIDSEY and MUSMANNO, JJ.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
OPINION PER CURIAM, April 14, 1952:
The Viewers' Report involved in this appeal complies with the pertinent legal requirements. The appellant's exceptions were, therefore, properly dismissed.
The findings and conclusions of the Viewers, which Section 9 of the Act of June 23, 1911, P.L. 1123, 16 PS § 3118, contemplates, were inherently essential parts of the Schedule of Awards contained in the Report. Nothing further...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
