1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 170 Pa.Super.
  5. 170 Pa.Super. 435 (1952)
 

H.J. HEINZ CO. v. PITTSBURGH

170 Pa.Super. 435 (1952)

H.J. Heinz Company, Appellant, v. Pittsburgh.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

March 18, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank W. Ittel, with him Carl E. Glock, Jr. and Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, for appellant.

J. Frank McKenna, Jr., Assistant City Solicitor, with him Anne X. Alpern, City Solicitor, for appellees.

Before RHODES, P.J., HIRT, RENO, DITHRICH, ROSS, ARNOLD and GUNTHER, JJ.

OPINION BY HIRT, J., March 18, 1952:

Equity will enjoin taxation for want of power to tax. Jamison C. & C. Co. v. Unity Twsp. Sch. Dist., 362 Pa. 389, 66 A.2d 759, especially where as here, the provision for an appeal in a city ordinance fails to provide an adequate remedy for contesting the assessment. Alleging lack of authority to tax, the plaintiff in this equity proceeding sought to restrain the collection

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases