GREELEY ARCADE v. ROTHENBERG

Civ. No. 52-258.

105 F.Supp. 489 (1952)

GREELEY ARCADE, Inc. v. ROTHENBERG et al.

United States District Court D. Massachusetts.

May 27, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stuart Macmillan and William P. Cunningham (of Haussermann, Davison & Shattuck), Boston, Mass., Max Edelman, New York City, for plaintiff.

Paul E. Troy, Boston, Mass., for defendants.


SWEENEY, Chief Judge.

Each of the three defendants has filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. I am satisfied that on Count One the two Rothenberg defendants are properly charged in an action for rescission and the motions as to this count are denied as to them. Since it appears that the defendant Bergson was not a party to the contract, an action for rescission cannot be maintained against him and his motion for judgment on the first count is allowed.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases