STATE v. PERILLO


18 N.J. Super. 549 (1952)

87 A.2d 727

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH PERILLO, AND OTHERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 2, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph A. Murphy, Assistant Deputy Attorney-General, argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney-General, Attorney; Mr. Herman M. Bell, Deputy Attorney-General, on the brief).

Mr. Albert S. Gross argued the cause for the appellants. Joseph Perillo and Julia Perillo.

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.

The conviction of the appellants, Joseph and Julia Perillo, was based in large part on hearsay evidence. They were tried on an indictment charging that they and one Salvado conspired to keep a bookmaking establishment at 7 Nicholson Street, Lodi. The State readily proved that bookmaking was carried on at the address mentioned but had difficulty in connecting the Perillos with the enterprise. To this end, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases