AUGENBLICK v. AUGENBLICK


203 Misc. 360 (1952)

Hattie C. Augenblick et al., Plaintiffs, v. David S. Augenblick et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

November 12, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Corrado & Basta for plaintiffs.

Reid A. Curtis for defendants.


DALY, J.

In an action for damages resulting from personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, Hattie C. Augenblick, and for medical expenses, loss of services and consortium sustained by her husband, the plaintiff, Israel Augenblick, the defendants served a notice upon the plaintiffs' attorneys, dated October 6, 1952, pursuant to the provisions of rule 121-a of the Rules of Civil Practice, to take the plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases