1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 171 Pa.Super.
  5. 171 Pa.Super. 391 (1952)
 

PITTSBURGH v. PA. P.U.C.

171 Pa.Super. 391 (1952)

Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

July 24, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anne X. Alpern, City Solicitor, with her J.M. Marshall, Assistant City Solicitor, for City of Pittsburgh.

Clarence Freedman, for Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

C.K. Robinson, for Pittsburgh Railways Company.

Before RHODES, P.J., RENO, DITHRICH, ROSS, ARNOLD and GUNTHER, JJ. (HIRT, J., absent).

PER CURIAM, July 24, 1952:

We shall make an order granting supersedeas in City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, No. 173, April Term, 1952. In view of the nature of the proceedings we shall give our reasons for making the following order.

The Pittsburgh Railways Company, on June 24, 1952, filed a new tariff of rates and fares for street car service, Rail Pa. P.U.C. No. P-24, to become effective July 27, 1952, and canceling Rail Pa. P...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases