ZINK v. CARLILE

No. 16779.

248 P.2d 306 (1952)

126 Colo. 208

ZINK v. CARLILE et al.

Supreme Court of Colorado, en Banc.

August 18, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bellinger & Faricy, Pueblo, for plaintiff in error.

Seavy & Seavy, Pueblo, for defendant in error.


MOORE, Justice.

We will herein refer to the parties by name or as they appeared in the trial court, where plaintiff in error was plaintiff, and defendants in error were defendants.

Prior to April 12, 1944, Carrie M. Zink, B. A. Carlile, C. B. Carlile and Hatta C. Whitfield were partners in the ownership of certain real and personal property, in the income from which each of said partners had shared equally. They were the sons and daughters of one James N....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases