GRISTON v. ROSENFIELD


280 A.D. 273 (1952)

Harris J. Griston, Respondent, v. Edward M. Rosenfield, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 18, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mitchell Salem Fisher of counsel (Mendel Zucker and Sol Deutsch with him on the brief; Deutsch & Zucker, attorneys), for appellant.

Harris Jay Griston of counsel (David Gerhardt, attorney), for respondent.

PECK, P. J., COHN, VAN VOORHIS and BERGAN, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

This is an action by an attorney against a husband for the value of legal services rendered to a wife in a proceeding to obtain custody of a child. The complaint alleges that the defendant caused the wife to leave their home and detained the child, requiring the wife to institute a habeas corpus proceeding, in which plaintiff represented the wife. The theory of the present action is that the services to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases