The facts have been stated in our previous opinion filed upon exceptions to the master's original report and will not be restated here.
Defendants contend that no rent is due by them to plaintiffs because under the Act of June 24, 1895, P.L. 237, they were not in exclusive possession of the premises which were the subject of the partition proceeding. This provides:
"In...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
