1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 195 F.2d
  5. 195 F.2d 353 (1952)
 

AMERICAN INDEMNITY CO. v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.

Nos. 11383, 11384.

195 F.2d 353 (1952)

AMERICAN INDEMNITY CO. v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. SAMUEL STAMPING & ENAMELING CO. v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 9, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. H. Hoffstot, Jr., Kansas City, Mo. (Edward W. Kuhn, and McDonald, McDonald & Kuhn, all of Memphis, Tenn., Henry W. Buck, W. H. Hoffstot, Jr., and Morrison, Hecker, Buck, Cozad & Rogers, all of Kansas City, on the brief), for appellants.

W. P. Armstrong, Jr., Memphis, Tenn. (Emmett W. Braden, Walter P. Armstrong, Jr., Memphis, Tenn., on the brief), for appellee.

Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and SIMONS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

The appeal in 11,383 is from a judgment on a manufacturer's and contractor's liability policy, issued by the appellant to the Samuel Stamping & Enameling Company, insuring it against any liability for claims against it based upon defects in its product, and covering specifically its Homart floor furnace. The policy had been extended, by endorsement, to include Sears, Roebuck & Company, as retailer of this product. The appeal in 11,384...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases