1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 110 F.Supp.
  5. 110 F.Supp. 422 (1952)
 

UNITED STATES v. GENERAL RY. SIGNAL CO.

Civ. No. 5237.

110 F.Supp. 422 (1952)

UNITED STATES v. GENERAL RY. SIGNAL CO. et al.

United States District Court W. D. New York.

November 17, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip B. Telman, Acting Atty. Gen., Donald P. McHugh, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., George L. Grobe, U. S. Atty., for the Western Dist. of New York, Buffalo, N. Y., for plaintiff.

Raichle, Tucker & Moore, Buffalo, N. Y., for defendant General Ry. Signal Co., Frank G. Raichle, Mac Asbill and Willis B. Snell, III, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

KNIGHT, Chief Judge.

Defendant General Railway Signal Company has moved for a summary judgment in its favor as matter of law pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact.

For convenience, General Railway Signal Company will be referred to as "General"; Westinghouse Air Brake Corporation as "Union" (Union Switch & Signal Company having changed its name and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases