VOIGHT v. SAUNDERS

No. 34875.

206 Okla. 318 (1952)

243 P.2d 654

VOIGHT v. SAUNDERS et al.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

April 15, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph A. Moran, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

A.M. Widdows, Edmund Lashley, and Randall G. West, Tulsa, for defendant in error.

John B. Durfee, Tulsa, for interveners.


GIBSON, J.

This action involves questions as to the validity of three ordinances enacted by the board of commissioners of the city of Tulsa, namely: Ordinance No. 5024, which counsel, in their briefs, have designated Ordinance No. 1 for convenience; Ordinance No. 5150, designated Ordinance No. 2; and Ordinance No. 5270, designated Ordinance No. 3. For clarity we shall indicate in parentheses the designations employed by counsel.

In 1923 the Ninth Legislature...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases