1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 20 N.J.
  5. 20 N.J. Super. 487 (1952)
 

GEORGE M. BREWSTER & SON, INC. v. BOR. OF BOGOTA

20 N.J. Super. 487 (1952)

90 A.2d 58

GEORGE M. BREWSTER & SON, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOROUGH OF BOGOTA AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND TOWNSHIP OF WESTAMPTON AND TOWNSHIP OF MOUNT LAUREL, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 3, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Robert W. Criscuolo argued the cause for appellant Township of Westampton (Mr. Bayard Allen, attorney; Messrs. Parker, McCay & Criscuolo, of counsel).

Mr. Benjamin Marmer argued the cause for appellant Township of Mount Laurel.

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for respondent George M. Brewster & Son, Inc. (Messrs. Major & Carlsen, attorneys).

Mr. Irving C. Evers argued the cause for respondent Borough of Bogota (Mr. Walter H. Jones, attorney).

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and GOLDMANN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment (R.S. 2:26-66 et seq., R.S. 2:26-69; now N.J.S. 2A:16-50 et seq., N.J.S. 2A:16-53) of its rights and status under the statute concerning the assessment of tangible personal property (R.S. 54:4-9, as amended L. 1942, c. 281, § 2; L. 1943, c. 120, § 2; L. 1945, c. 163,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases