1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 23 N.J.
  5. 23 N.J. Super. 482 (1952)
 

EPSTEIN v. KUVIN

23 N.J. Super. 482 (1952)

93 A.2d 220

FRIEDA KUVIN EPSTEIN, EXECUTRIX OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF FANNIE KUVIN, AND SANFORD KUVIN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HERBERT KUVIN AND SAMUEL KUVIN, AND SAMUEL KUVIN, TRUSTEE AND GUARDIAN FOR LAURENCE KUVIN AND NEIL NATHAN KUVIN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 3, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Max M. Albach argued the cause for the plaintiffs-respondents.

Mr. Herbert Kuvin argued the cause for the defendants-appellants (Mr. Roswell S. Nichols, Jr., counsel for the defendants).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and FRANCIS.

PER CURIAM.

At the argument of this appeal the court called the attention of the defendant, Herbert Kuvin, a member of the Bar of this State, and Roswell S. Nichols, Jr., counsel for defendants-appellants, to certain statements made in their brief to the effect that the trial judge had: (1) "erroneously, through sympathy for plaintiff, strained itself into a wrongful legal decision based on improperly admitted evidence;" (2) "Will the court permit a judge, swayed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases