1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 107 F.Supp.
  5. 107 F.Supp. 398 (1952)
 

CARLSEN v. UNITED STATES

107 F.Supp. 398 (1952)

CARLSEN v. UNITED STATES et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

September 30, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sidney Szerlip, Brooklyn, N. Y., for plaintiff.

Myles J. Lane, U. S. Atty., Nathan Skolnik, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, E. Riggs McConnell, Department of Justice, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and Allen Crenshaw, Asst. Chief Counsel, Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, D. C., for United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission.

S. S. Eisen, New York City, for Rockland Coaches, Inc., Rockland Transit Corp., Spring Valley Motor Coach Co., Inc., and Hill Bus Co.

Before FRANK, Circuit Judge, and DIMOCK and WEINFELD, District Judges.

WEINFELD, District Judge.

Whenever a new schedule is filed, the Interstate Commerce Commission, pending a hearing and decision by it as to the reasonableness of the new rates, may suspend the operation of the schedule for a period not exceeding seven months beyond the time the schedule otherwise would have become effective.1

In the instant case, following the filing of new rate schedules by four interstate bus carriers, the plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases