1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 262 Wis.
  5. 262 Wis. 242 (1952)
 

SIBLIK v. MOTOR TRANSPORT CO.

262 Wis. 242 (1952)

SIBLIK, Respondent, vs. MOTOR TRANSPORT COMPANY and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 7, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Crosby H. Summers of Janesville, attorney, and McCue & Regan of Milwaukee of counsel, and oral argument by Mr. Summers.

For the respondent there was a brief by Kenney, Korf & Pfeil of Elkhorn, and oral argument by Francis J. Korf.

GEHL, J.

Defendants contend that at the time in question plaintiff was an employee of the Transport Company and that, therefore, his exclusive remedy is under the Workmen's Compensation Act. He went to the aid of Walters at the direction of the Tube Company's foreman, he had been previously directed by the warehouse foreman to aid truck drivers to move stalled trucks and had done so, the assistance was not rendered upon a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases