1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 370 Pa.
  5. 370 Pa. 132 (1952)
 

FRY v. STETSON

370 Pa. 132 (1952)

Fry, Appellant, v. Stetson.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 27, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cassin W. Craig, with him Morris Gerber and Wisler, Pearlstine, Talone & Gerber, for appellant.

Raymond A. White, Jr. and Thomas Stokes, with them Russell J. Brownback, Joseph S. Conwell, Jr., Robert B. Brunner, Brunner & Conver and Pepper Bodine, Stokes & Hamilton, for appellees.

Before DREW, C.J., STERN, STEARNE, BELL, CHIDSEY and MUSMANNO, JJ.

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE BELL, March 27, 1952:

Plaintiff, a judgment creditor of John B. Stetson, Jr., filed a Bill in Equity in 1948 for a partition of premises known as Pleasant Valley. She prayed not for a partition of future interests, but for an immediate partition of her debtor's presently existing interest in the premises. The basis of her claim is that G. Henry Stetson was devised only a personal license to use and occupy Pleasant Valley; that he abandoned this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases