1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 194 Or.
  5. 194 Or. 301 (1952)
 

SCHOOL DIST. NO. 68 v. HOSKINS

194 Or. 301 (1952)

240 P.2d 949

SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 68 ET AL. v. HOSKINS ET AL.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed February 14, 1952.

Petition for rehearing denied March 12, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George H. Layman, of Newberg, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Ernest J. Burrows, of Portland.

No appearance for respondents.

Before BRAND, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, LUSK, LATOURETTE, WARNER and TOOZE, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

TOOZE, J.

This is a proceeding by writ of review, instituted by School District No. 68 of Yamhill county, Oregon, for the purpose of having reviewed the action of the District Boundary Board of Yamhill county, relating to a change in boundaries of said district. The other plaintiffs, S.A. Stone, A.J. Lyon, Lucile Ingraham, G.C. Selby, O.W. Golden, and William A. Dopp, are residents, taxpayers, and legal voters...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases