FORREST, J., May 21, 1952.
Under the Act of May 4, 1927, P.L. 519, as amended, 53 PS § 12900, petitioners, Walter H. Todd and Elsie M. Todd, his wife, Walter Harold Todd and Helen Todd Cahill, filed their complaint and appeal on January 7, 1952, alleging in paragraph 11 as follows:
"11. Complainants aver that the said ordinance no. 969 is illegal and void for reasons inter alia as follows:
"(a) The borough advertised a proposed change from a ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
