DeMARCO v. ESTLOW


18 N.J. Super. 30 (1952)

86 A.2d 446

ANTHONY R. DeMARCO, PLAINTIFF, v. FRANCIS ESTLOW, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided January 29, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James D. Stockwell for plaintiff (Messrs. Bleakly, Stockwell and Zink, attorneys).

Mr. James M. Davis, Jr., attorney for defendant.


HANEMAN, J.S.C.

Prior to the filing of the answer in the above entitled cause, the defendant moved to strike the complaint on the ground that the same was insufficient in law. After argument before the Honorable C. Thomas Schettino, the motion was denied, without prejudice to the rights of the defendant to renew the same at the time of trial. This motion is therefore considered after answer filed.

The complaint set forth in some detail the negotiations and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases