1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 221 S.C.
  5. 221 S.C. 255 (1952)
 

BRADFORD ET AL. v. BYRNES, GOVERNOR

16610

221 S.C. 255 (1952)

70 S.E.2d 228

BRADFORD ET AL. v. BYRNES, GOVERNOR. MALONEY ET AL. v. BYRNES, GOVERNOR.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

April 1, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Raymond H. Tyler, of York, Wilson & Wilson, of Rock Hill, and J. Means McFadden, of Chester, for Appellants.

Messrs. T.C. Callison, Attorney General, James S. Verner, Assistant Attorney General, of Columbia, for Respondent, James F. Byrnes, Governor, R.B. Hildebrand and James D. Grist, Jr., of York, and W.C. McDow, of Rock Hill, for Respondent, W. Lewis Wallace, and Roddy & Ward, of Rock Hill, for Respondent, Dan S. Hollis.

April 1, 1952.

STUKES, Justice.

The appeals in the above stated cases were briefed by counsel and orally argued together and will be disposed of in a single opinion. The first captioned was conveniently called by counsel in argument, "the Richland case," and the second, "the York case." Both involve controversies which arise out of the interpretation and application of the York County Government Act of June 30, 1950, No. 962, 46 Stat. 2316. It was here before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases