MULKA v. KEYES

No. 32092.

41 Wn.2d 427 (1952)

249 P.2d 972

VICTOR R. MULKA et al., Appellants, v. ROSWELL P. KEYES et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

November 6, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Forrest & Rowles, for appellants.

Eggerman, Rosling & Williams, for respondents.


DONWORTH, J.

This is an action for malpractice. Defendant Roswell P. Keyes is a physician and surgeon practicing his profession in Bellingham, as is the other defendant, his brother Howard. On June 18, 1947, after having diagnosed plaintiff wife's physical trouble as an ovarian cyst, Roswell operated on her for the purpose of removing it. Howard served as his assistant in the surgery.

In the course of the operation Roswell cut the patient's left ureter about...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases