1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 139 Conn.
  5. 139 Conn. 327 (1952)
 

ALVAREZ v. ADMINISTRATOR

139 Conn. 327 (1952)

DOLORES ALVAREZ ET AL. v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided December 9, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Arcudi, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Harry Silverstone, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was George C. Conway, attorney general, for the appellee (defendant administrator).

BROWN, C. J., JENNINGS, BALDWIN, INGLIS and O'SULLIVAN, JS.

INGLIS, J.

The question in this case is whether the unemployment of the plaintiffs was due to a labor dispute so that pursuant to § 7508 (3) of the General Statutes they are ineligible for benefits on account of that unemployment.

The facts found by the unemployment commissioner may be stated as follows: The seventy-eight union plaintiffs, who are appealing, were, on April 20, 1951, and prior thereto, production...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases