SPINDLER v. UNIVERSAL CHAIN CORP.


11 N.J. 34 (1952)

93 A.2d 171

MINA SPINDLER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. UNIVERSAL CHAIN CORP., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 15, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Henry Harris argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Rothbard, Harris & Oxfeld, attorneys; Mr. Samuel L. Rothbard, on the brief).

Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Kalisch & Kalisch, attorneys).


The opinion of the court was delivered by WACHENFELD, J.

This is the fourth tribunal to consider whether or not the petitioning employee is entitled to compensation for an injury suffered while she was performing her usual duties at her customary place of work.

The inquiry is whether or not the petitioner established by the preponderance of probabilities that she suffered injury by reason of an accident arising out of and in the course of her employment, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases