THOMPSON v. BD. OF ED., MILLVILLE


20 N.J. Super. 419 (1952)

90 A.2d 63

CLARENCE W. THOMPSON AND RUTH M. THOMPSON, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, CITY OF MILLVILLE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 27, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Nathaniel Rogovoy argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Mr. Lawrence N. Park argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Mr. M. Joseph Greenblatt, attorney).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW and FRANCIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, S.J.A.D.

The question for determination is whether, under the allegations of the plaintiff's amended complaint, her action is barred by the provisions of N.J.S.A. 18:5-30. Under a different theory of law, the same factual situation is presented in Thompson v. Board of Education, City of Millville, 12 N.J.Super. 92 (Cty. Ct. 1951), wherein the court dismissed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases