1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 40 Wn.2d
  5. 40 Wn.2d 395 (1952)
 

RUSTUEN v. APRO

No. 31841.

40 Wn.2d 395 (1952)

243 P.2d 479

ERNEST RUSTUEN, Respondent, v. STEPHAN APRO et al., Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

April 24, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chavelle & Chavelle, for appellants.

Clark, Stone & Hoover, for respondent.

HAMLEY, J.

Ernest Rustuen, the prospective purchaser of a restaurant business in Seattle, brought this action against the sellers, Stephan Apro and wife, to recover thirteen hundred dollars paid on the purchase price. Apro's attorneys and their respective wives were also named as defendants, but the action was dismissed with prejudice as to them. Apro will be herein referred to as if he were the only defendant and appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases