STATE v. COTTER


262 Wis. 168 (1952)

STATE, Respondent, vs. COTTER, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 20, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Doar & Knowles of New Richmond, and oral argument by John Doar.

For the respondent there was a brief by the Attorney General and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Platz.


BROADFOOT, J.

The defendant contends that he is entitled to a new trial because of an incident that occurred as the jury retired to the juryroom for its deliberations. The affidavit of defendant's counsel made in support of his motion for a new trial related the incident as follows:

". . . that the jury impaneled . . . , after retiring to the juryroom for deliberation, was visited by and talked to by Sheriff Emil Stusek, who was appointed as officer in charge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases