PURITAN MILLS INCORPORATED v. FUTCH

34061, 34062.

86 Ga. App. 338 (1952)

71 S.E.2d 657

PURITAN MILLS INCORPORATED v. FUTCH (two cases).

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided June 20, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. J. Quincey, Marshall, Greene, Baird & Neely, Ferdinand Buckley, for plaintiff in error.

Gibson & Maddox, contra.


FELTON, J.

Since the issues are the same in both bills of exceptions, the cases will be considered together.

The evidence demanded a finding that the service was not legally perfected against Puritan Mills Inc. The copy of the petition and process was served on Jimmie Wren as agent of Puritan Mills, but the evidence clearly showed that Wren was merely a retailer who bought products from Puritan Mills for resale, and was not an agent of Puritan Mills upon whom...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases