1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 21 N.J.
  5. 21 N.J. Super. 401 (1952)
 

LONG v. MERTZ

21 N.J. Super. 401 (1952)

91 A.2d 341

OZA MERTZ LONG, AS ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM L. MERTZ AND ANOTHER, ETC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued and decided September 15, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Raymond C. Connell argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Francis W. Hayden argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Crummy & Consodine, attorneys; Mr. Andrew B. Crummy, of counsel; Mr. John K. Bangs, on the brief).

Before Judges McGEEHAN, BIGELOW and SMALLEY.

At the conclusion of the argument, the court conferred and then affirmed the judgment for the reasons stated orally by BIGELOW, J.A.D.

We are satisfied that the decree should be affirmed and see no reason for deferring the pronouncement of the judgment.

The plaintiff's intestate was in partnership with the defendants. Upon his death, the surviving partners, that is, the defendants, continued the business and under our statute became liable to account to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases