BISHOP v. DUCK CREEK IRR. CO.

No. 7660.

121 Utah 290 (1952)

241 P.2d 162

BISHOP v. DUCK CREEK IRR. CO. et al.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Decided February 28, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christenson & Christenson, and A. Sherman Christenson, all of Provo, for appellant.

Elias Hansen, Salt Lake City, for respondent.


CROCKETT, Justice.

The controversy herein is over rights to the water of Duck Creek, just south of Benjamin, Utah County. The trial court decreed to the appellant Duck Creek Irrigation Company a basic flow of two second feet and ordered the rest of the stream divided between the parties: 300/368 to appellant and 68/368 to respondent during the irrigation season; and 400/568 to appellant and 168/568 to the respondent during...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases