1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 158 Ohio
  5. 158 Ohio St. 249 (1952)
 

STATE, EX REL. SOCOTCH v. BRYANT

No. 33095.

158 Ohio St. 249 (1952)

THE STATE, EX REL. SOCOTCH, v. BRYANT, DIR., ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 12, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Isadore Topper and Mr. William J. Kraus, for relatrix.

Mr. C. William O'Neill, attorney general, Mr. Robert E. Leach and Mr. Brown W. Pettit, for respondent Director of Liquor Control.

MIDDLETON, J.

The first and most important question to be answered is whether the respondent Director of Liquor Control had the power to issue a valid permit to relatrix on October 17, 1951. If he did not have such power the class D-5 permit, certificate No. 21509, was null and void and no right to operate under it ever accrued to relatrix.

By Section 6064-7, General Code, the Director of Liquor Control is empowered to exercise and perform the duties vested...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases