1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 201 F.2d
  5. 201 F.2d 202 (1952)
 

GARFINKLE v. NEEDLE

No. 11323.

201 F.2d 202 (1952)

GARFINKLE v. NEEDLE.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided December 11, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Luria, Washington, D. C., with whom William R. Lichtenberg, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Hans A. Nathan, Washington, D. C., with whom Bert B. Rand and Lynne A. Kaufman, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, BAZELON and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the judgment for the plaintiff-appellee in a suit on a promissory note. The sole defense raised was that of the three-year statute of limitations, D.C.Code § 12-201 (1951 Ed.). The note as introduced by the plaintiff-appellee was dated November 1, 1946. Suit was filed on October 31, 1949 — one day before the expiration of three years. Prima facie, therefore, the statute of limitations would have no application. Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases