HEINLEN v. MARTIN MILLER ORCHARDS

No. 31849.

40 Wn.2d 356 (1952)

242 P.2d 1054

CLIFFORD A. HEINLEN, Appellant, v. MARTIN MILLER ORCHARDS, INC., Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

April 17, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome Williams and Patrick H. Murphy, for appellant.

Gordon H. Sweany, Carl P. Zapp, Mansfield & Watson, and R.E. Mansfield, for respondent.


OLSON, J.

At the conclusion of the plaintiff's case, in the trial of this cause before a jury, the court sustained the defendant's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence and dismissed the action with prejudice. These rulings are assigned as error by the plaintiff in this appeal.

The facts, considered most favorably for the plaintiff, are as follows: Plaintiff was employed by defendant to work in its orchards, and, at the time of his injury, was in charge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases