MANTEUFFEL v. THEO. HAMM BREWING CO.

No. 35,780.

238 Minn. 140 (1952)

KENNETH MANTEUFFEL v. THEO. HAMM BREWING COMPANY.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

December 12, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Merlyn C. Green and Bundlie, Kelley, Finley & Maun, for appellant.

Harold Shear, for respondent.


KNUTSON, JUSTICE.

Appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff.

Plaintiff, who was employed by William Baumeister Construction Company as a painter, was assigned to work at defendant's plant about October 15, 1949, and continued to work there until the date of the injury giving rise to this cause of action, which was January 5, 1950. While working in defendant's plant, he, as well as other painters, was under the direct supervision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases