OPINION BY ARNOLD, J., December 12, 1952:
This was an action of replevin to recover a diamond ring from the defendant, a licensed pawnbroker. The case was heard by the court below without a jury, resulting in a judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appealed.
The plaintiff made out his case by showing the ownership of the ring in question. The defendant attempted to set up a defense and offered testimony to show that on November 5, 1949, one Sidney Master...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
