WUESTHOFF v. DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION


261 Wis. 105 (1952)

WUESTHOFF, Respondent, vs. DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, Appellant. POST, Respondent, vs. SAME, Appellant. RIEDEBURG, Respondent, vs. SAME, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 4, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by the Attorney General and Harold H. Persons and E. Weston Wood, assistant attorneys general, and Neil Conway, inheritance tax counsel, and oral argument by Mr. Persons, Mr. Conway, and Mr. Wood.

For the respondents there was a brief by Lines, Spooner & Quarles, attorneys, and Louis Quarles, Maxwell H. Herriott, and Richard R. Teschner of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Herriott and Mr. Teschner.


MARTIN, J.

These cases arise out of the transaction involved in case No. 136 and the questions involved are the same as presented there. They are therefore ruled by that decision, Wuesthoff v. Department of Taxation, ante, p. 98, 52 N. W. 131.

By the Court.—Judgment affirmed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases