1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 171 Pa.Super.
  5. 171 Pa.Super. 187 (1952)
 

CITY OF PITTSBURGH v. PA. P.U.C.

171 Pa.Super. 187 (1952)

City of Pittsburgh, Appellant, v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

July 17, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Alfred Wilner and Anne X. Alpern, City Solicitor, for City of Pittsburgh.

R.C. Orr, with him Harold F. Reed and Reed, Ewing & Ray, for St. Joseph Lead Company of Pennsylvania.

Robert H. Griswold, with him McNees, Wallace & Nurick, for Crucible Steel Company of America.

Thomas J. Munsch, Jr., and Charles E. Kenworthey, with them C.K. Robinson and David Dunlap, for Duquesne Light Company.

John E. Fullerton, Assistant Counsel and Lloyd S. Benjamin, Acting Counsel, with them William J. Grove, for Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

Before RHODES, P.J., HIRT, RENO, DITHRICH, ROSS, ARNOLD and GUNTHER, JJ.

OPINION BY RHODES, P.J., July 17, 1952:

This is a rate case which had its inception on February 6, 1950, when Duquesne Light Company filed a new tariff (No. 10) with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. The effective date was to be April 10, 1950. It was estimated that the effect of the proposed tariff would be an increase in annual revenue of $7,720,612. Complaints against the proposed tariff were filed by the City of Pittsburgh, Borough of Oakmont, City of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases