1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 21 N.J.
  5. 21 N.J. Super. 330 (1952)
 

HAYTKO v. WILLIAM CRABB & CO.

21 N.J. Super. 330 (1952)

91 A.2d 231

WILLIAM HAYTKO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM CRABB AND CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 16, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Marshall Crowley argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Toner, Crowley & Ackerman, attorneys; Mr. Robert A. Vanderbilt, on the brief).

Mr. Harry Cohn argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges JAYNE, PROCTOR, and SCHETTINO.

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

We concur in the conclusion expressed by Judge Francis and reported in 17 N.J.Super. 95 (Co. Ct., Law Div., 1951).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases