1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 90 A.2d
  5. 90 A.2d 229 (1952)
 

KING v. UNITED STATES

No. 1230.

90 A.2d 229 (1952)

KING v. UNITED STATES.

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided July 25, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry E. Taylor, Jr., Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Edward O. Fennell, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom Charles M. Irelan, U. S. Atty., Joseph M. Howard and Lewis A. Carroll, Asst. U. S. Attys., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before CAYTON, Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

Again we are called upon to decide whether evidence was sufficient to sustain a conviction on a charge that a defendant violated a section of our Code1 which makes it a crime for any person to invite, entice, persuade any person to accompany, etc., him or her to any place for any immoral or lewd purpose, or to address for any of those purposes.

The conviction in this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases