DIXIE BROADCASTING CORP. v. RIVERS

17737, 17738.

209 Ga. 98 (1952)

70 S.E.2d 734

DIXIE BROADCASTING CORPORATION et al. v. RIVERS; et vice versa.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided April 16, 1952.

Rehearing Denied May 14, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bouhan, Lawrence, Williams & Levy, Douglas, McWhorter & Adams, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, and J. Winston Huff, for plaintiff in error.

Marvin O'Neal Jr., contra.


CANDLER, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) 1-4. Headnotes 1, 2, 3, and 4 do not require elaboration.

5. The pleader does not characterize his action. He simply sets forth facts upon which he relies for recovery; and, if these facts are such as in law entitle the plaintiff to recover, it is not necessary that the action should be classified or characterized by any name. In this case the plaintiff complains...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases