1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 9 N.J.
  5. 9 N.J. 294 (1952)
 

STRUYK v. SAMUEL BRAEN'S SONS

9 N.J. 294 (1952)

88 A.2d 201

NEIL STRUYK, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE BOROUGH OF NORTH HALEDON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL BRAEN'S SONS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 5, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Hugh C. Spernow argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Evans, Hand and Evans, of counsel).

Mr. Paul Rittenberg argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Peter Hofstra, attorney; Mr. Howard Stern, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge William J. Brennan, Jr., in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and JACOBS — 5.

For reversal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases