1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 261 Wis.
  5. 261 Wis. 39 (1952)
 

JEFFERSON COUNTY v. TIMMEL

261 Wis. 39 (1952)

JEFFERSON COUNTY, Respondent, vs. TIMMEL, Appellant,

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 5, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Brendemuehl & Brendemuehl of Oconomowoc, and oral argument by A. G. Brendemuehl and Curtis A. Brendemuehl.

Thorpe Merriman, district attorney, for the respondent.

BROADFOOT, J.

On this appeal the defendant advances the following contentions:

(1) That the zoning ordinance, as amended by the 1947 amendments, was invalid because of the alleged failure to comply with the following statutory procedural requirements:

(a) No map was attached to the proposed ordinance or amendment.

(b) The original ordinance and 1947 amendments were not published.

(c) No written...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases