1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 198 F.2d
  5. 198 F.2d 82 (1952)
 

RILEY v. RITZ

Nos. 11287, 11288.

198 F.2d 82 (1952)

RILEY v. RITZ. RILEY v. BULL et al.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided May 29, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miss Mary M. Riley, pro se.

Mr. Lewis A. Carroll, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Charles M. Irelan, U. S. Atty., and Joseph M. Howard, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellees.

Before CLARK, PRETTYMAN and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. Our affirmance as to defendants Peach, Hoffman and Bull is because jurisdiction was not obtained over them. They were not personally served within this jurisdiction, they did not submit to the jurisdiction of the court, and it does not appear that they are inhabitants of the District. Our affirmance as to defendant Ritz rests upon the authority of De Arnaud v. Ainsworth, 1904, 24 App.D.C. 167, 5 L.R.A.,N.S., 163, dismissed per curiam, 1905,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases