1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 21 N.J.
  5. 21 N.J. Super. 258 (1952)
 

SZCZYTKO v. PUBLIC SERVICE COORDINATED TRANSPORT

21 N.J. Super. 258 (1952)

91 A.2d 116

HENRY SZCZYTKO, ANNA SZCZYTKO, AND EDMUND J. SZCZYTKO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COORDINATED TRANSPORT, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND IRVING LEVIN AND ABE LEVIN, PARTNERS TRADING AS L. & M. EXPRESS CO., AND PAUL MARINO, JR., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 29, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest Fasano argued the cause for the appellants (Quinn, Doremus, McCue & Russell, attorneys).

Abraham I. Harkavy, argued the cause for the respondents (Harkavy & Lieb, attorneys; Jerome S. Lieb on the brief).

Before Judges DANIEL J. BRENNAN, McLEAN and EWART.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DANIEL J. BRENNAN, J.S.C.

This is an appeal from the whole of the final judgment entered in favor of Irving Levin and Abe Levin, partners trading as L. & M. Express Co., and their driver, Paul Marino, Jr., at the conclusion of the plaintiffs' case. The trial court entered a judgment of no cause for action in favor of the defendants, Public Service Coordinated Transport, Nunzio Daniello, Sam Maita, Irving Levin and Abe...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases