COX v. McCORMICK TRANSP. CO.


91 A.2d 185 (1952)

COX v. McCORMICK TRANSP. CO.

Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle.

August 6, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew D. Christie, Wilmington, for employee-appellant.

John P. Sinclair, of the Firm of Berl, Potter & Anderson, Wilmington, for employer-appellee.


TERRY, Judge.

The question presented is very narrow. It does not concern the period of time for which Cox was awarded compensation (ten weeks), but merely the amount of compensation so awarded (twenty-five dollars per week). Cox contends that the language employed under the provisions of Section 10, Subsection (g), of the act is clear and readily understandable and that, if he is entitled to compensation at all under the provisions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases