1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 21 N.J.
  5. 21 N.J. Super. 237 (1952)
 

STILES v. HAMMOND

21 N.J. Super. 237 (1952)

91 A.2d 104

HOWARD STILES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD HAMMOND, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 4, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. A. David Epstein argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Rose & Epstein, attorneys).

Mr. Henry S. Ross argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. W. Louis Bossle on the brief).

Before Judges BIGELOW, LEYDEN and BURTON.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BURTON, J.S.C.

This is an appeal from an order of the Chancery Division of the Superior Court denying the defendant's motion for a stay of proceedings pending arbitration, under the provisions of R.S. 2:40-10 to 26, now N.J.S. 2A:24-1 to 11.

The plaintiff Howard Stiles and the defendant Richard Hammond entered into a written agreement, dated April 30, 1951, wherein plaintiff agreed to sell, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases