BARTLETT v. CHISHOLM


86 A.2d 166 (1952)

BARTLETT v. CHISHOLM et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

January 31, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Connellan, Portland, for plaintiff.

Berman, Berman & Wernick, Portland, for defendants.

Before MURCHIE, C. J., and THAXTER, FELLOWS, MERRILL, NULTY, WILLIAMSON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

This case comes before us for the second time, this time on exceptions by the defendant to the allowance of a motion to amend the writ and declaration filed by the plaintiff after the decision of this court in the same entitled action reported in 146 Me. 206, 79 A.2d 167. In the original writ and declaration, plaintiff failed to allege that he was a duly licensed and qualified real estate broker under the laws of Maine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases